Franketology: February 24, 2026

If you live in a cave and do not get college basketball news, the NCAA Selection Committee released their top-4 seed lines preview on Saturday. Here’s the seed list, with their regions:

  1. Michigan (Midwest)

  2. Duke (East)

  3. Arizona (West)

  4. Iowa St. (South)

  5. UConn (South)

  6. Houston (Midwest)

  7. Illinois (East)

  8. Purdue (West)

  9. Florida (Midwest)

  10. Kansas (East)

  11. Nebraska (South)

  12. Gonzaga (West)

  13. Texas Tech (South)

  14. Michigan St. (West)

  15. Vanderbilt (East)

  16. Virginia (Midwest)

A lot to digest there. I think, as of Saturday, they had this mostly right. Indeed, on Thursday, I had this mostly the same, except I had UConn 8th, Gonzaga over Kansas and Nebraska, and I had already dropped Texas Tech to the 5-seed line anticipating them getting dinged for the Toppin injury, and the rest of my 4-seeds were the same, except I had MSU below Vandy and Virginia. So kudos to me, I guess.

Since that release, a lot has changed. Iowa St. took a bad loss at home to Saunders-less BYU, Duke beat Michigan on a neutral floor. UConn steadied the ship with a win over Villanova, Arizona beat Houston, UVa struggled with Miami (FL) at home, and Vandy narrowly lost at home to Tennessee. This obviously caused some movement, the biggest of which will be that Michigan falls below Duke for the number 1 overall seed. However, this is pure vanity, as it doesn’t affect regional preferences, with Michigan remaining in the midwest region, and Duke remaining in the east. With the bad loss and the UConn win, UConn gets back to the 1-seed line. UConn did most of their work out-of-conference, but they still have the best collection of top-line wins of any team in contention for the last 1-seed, with NET ranks:

UConn: Illinois (N) (4), Florida (N) (7), at Kansas (18)
Iowa St.: at Purdue (6), Houston (8), St. John’s (N) (23)
Houston: Texas Tech (14), at BYU (19), Arkansas (N) (20)
Illinois: at Purdue (6), at Nebraska (11), Tennessee (N) (17)
Purdue: at Nebraska (11), Texas Tech (N) (14), at Alabama (21)

Those wins are keeping UConn a hair above the rest, as they’re 7-2 in Q1, the highest Q1 win percentage of the bunch, have a WAB of 4, and resume metrics average of 4, but they have a predictive metrics average of just 10.33, below the other 4 teams on that list, with ISU and Purdue tied at 7.67. The committee clearly saw fit to reward those quality wins. Should be notable that ISU, who was ahead of UConn in the eyes of the Committee, probably has just the 3rd best set of top-tier wins. Illinois’ trio def gives UConn a run for their money.

All of this is to say, I think you can safely lock the top-3 1-seeds, in whatever order, but there’s everything to play for the teams vying for that last 1-seed.

Many reading this will know, I’m a diehard St. John’s fan, with season tickets at center court, 3 rows behind the announcers. So let’s have a brief discussion about my Johnnies. One of the other things that came out Saturday was that the top-2 5-seeds were Alabama and Arkansas, in that order. Both teams held serve after the announcement, so that means neither is likely to have moved in the eyes of the committee. What that mean, in my humble opinion, is that the final 2 5-seeds comes down to the following 3 teams:

Battle for the last 2 5-seeds

I had SJU on the 5-seed line with Tennessee up to this point. However, with UNC defeating Louisville, without Caleb Wilson gives them the push they need to over take both those teams and slot comfortable into the 3rd 5-seed slot. They have the 2nd best resume metrics in the group. The 2nd most wins against at large teams (based on the current BracketMatrix.com consensus), their top-3 wins stack up nicely against Tennessee, and both blow St. John’s tpo-3 wins out of the water. UNC does not have a loss outside Q1, while Tennessee has a Q2 loss and SJU has a Q3. UNC has more Q1A, more Q1 wins total, and a better Q1A and Q1 win percentage than Tennessee. If there’s one thing that can be taken from the committee’s work on Saturday, it’s that they intend to emphasize quality of wins, and focusing on the high-end wins, over efficiency metrics. It’s admittedly a close call, but given the focus on results, and North Carolina’s lack of bad losses, better Q1A win percentage, better Q1 win percentage, and having 1 more Q1 win than Tennessee, I gave UNC the edge.

After slotting UNC as the 3rd 5-seed, it seems clear to me that St. John’s resume simply isn’t as good as Tennessee. Tennessee has more wins against the field by a factor of 4, they have 5 Q1 wins, all of the Q1A variety versus just 2-1 and 3 total Q1 victories for St. Joh’s, Tennessee’s only loss outside of Q1 is a Q2 loss at Syracuse, which holds up far better than St. John’s Q3 home loss to Providence, and Tennessee is better in every team sheet metrics except KPI.

In short, there simply isn’t a case that St. John’s has a better resume than either of these teams. The only place St. John’s is clearly above either team is in efficiency metrics, and even there, St. John’s only surpasses UNC. This is the unfortunate reality of playing in the Big East this season. Other teams continue to have excellent opportunities to improve their resumes, while the Big East has basically become the East Coast Conference, with 2-3 good teams playing a handful of meaningful games against each other while trying to avoid the land mines. UNC is a prime example—they got a Q1A home home win over a team ranked 14th in NET, with a resume metrics average of 14.67. That’s enough of a boost metrically and in their results to put them over the edge. There’s also the added circumstance that Kansas, by virtue of their win last night over Houston jumped from 18th in NET to 13th in NET, which gave UNC another Q1A win, as Kansas crossed the threshold of 15th for a Q1A home victory. So UNC picked up 2 Q1A wins last night, boosting them up to the 5-line at the expense of St. John’s.

Without further ado, here’s the bracket:

Seed List

  1. Duke

  2. Michigan

  3. Arizona

  4. UConn

  5. Purdue

  6. Iowa St.

  7. Houston

  8. Florida

  9. Illinois

  10. Kansas

  11. Nebraska

  12. Gonzaga

  13. Michigan St.

  14. Virginia

  15. Texas Tech

  16. Vanderbilt

  17. Alabama

  18. Arkansas

  19. North Carolina

  20. Tennessee

  21. St. John's

  22. BYU

  23. Louisville

  24. Saint Louis

  25. NC St.

  26. Wisconsin

  27. Kentucky

  28. Utah St.

  29. Villanova

  30. SMU

  31. Iowa

  32. Auburn

  33. Clemson

  34. Texas A&M

  35. UCF

  36. Miami (FL)

  37. UCLA

    Last Four Byes

  38. Georgia

  39. Texas

  40. Indiana

  41. Missouri

    Last Four In

  42. Saint Mary's (CA)

  43. TCU

  44. New Mexico

  45. Santa Clara

    Other Auto Bids

  46. South Fla.

  47. Belmont

  48. McNeese St.

  49. Yale

  50. Akron

  51. Liberty

  52. High Point

  53. Utah Valley

  54. Hofstra

  55. UC Irvine

  56. North Dakota St.

  57. Austin Peay

  58. ETSU

  59. Navy

  60. Arkansas St.

  61. Merrimack

  62. Wright St.

  63. UT Martin

  64. Marist

  65. Montana St.

  66. UMBC

  67. Howard

  68. Bethune-Cookman

    First Four Out

  69. Ohio St.

  70. Cincy

  71. Southern California

  72. VCU

    Next Four Out

  73. San Diego St.

  74. Miami (OH)

  75. California

  76. Virginia Tech

Next
Next

Franketology: February 19, 2026